How Computerized Criticism From A Computerized Arithmetic Course Reading Influences Rudimentary School Students Conceptual Improvement: Two Case Thinks About In Indonesia
Keywords:
Digital , Automated Feedback , Learning Process , Conceptual Development, Probability Task Design, Based ResearchAbstract
One of the key highlights recognizing computerized arithmetic reading material from conventional ones is the arrangement of computerized input on students' arrangements. Input is recognized as a vital figure impacting the learning prepare, making it a outstanding advantage of computerized course readings. Whereas broad quantitative inquire about has inspected the common viability of input, there's constrained understanding of how input particularly impacts students' person learning forms and conceptual improvement. To address this gap, a hypothetical system Based on Labardelle's instrumental theory and Bernaud's conceptual theory ranges was made to subjectively look at the portion of criticism interior learning handle. This system has been linked in one case, consider checking about two basic fields understudies in Indonesia as they worked on a likelihood errand from a 3rd-grade computerized course scrutinizing. The investigation given a point by point reproduction of how the understudies deciphered the input and balanced their behavior in like manner. This in-depth examination revealed that criticism does not ceaselessly develop conceptual headway inside the arranging way, and a amend course of action does not in a general sense alter with conceptual understanding. The disclosures highlight many challenges understudies go up against when working independently on errands from computerized science course readings with robotized input, prescribing that feedback rebellious require progress refinement through design-based examine cycles to realize the desired comes about.
Downloads
References
Alhezzani, Y. M. R. (2020). Change recipients’ resistance and salience to organizational re-creation: the effects of participation and coercion strategies on change derailment. Organization Management Journal, 18(1), 2-18.
Andriani, N., Maskos, S. S., & Novaliza, A. (2021). Pre-service physics teacher perspective towards e-book for basic electronics course. 4th Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (SULE-IC 2020),
Blok, V. (2022). The role of human creativity in human-technology relations. Philosophy & Technology, 35(3), 59.
Cserni, R. T., & Rademacher, H. E. (2021). A 3-2-1 approach to undergraduate reading compliance and critical analysis. College Teaching, 69(4), 233-242.
Geng, X., Chen, L., Xu, Y., Ogata, H., Shimada, A., & Yamada, M. (2024). Learning behavioral patterns of students with varying performance in a high school mathematics course using an e-book system. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19.
Goffman, E. (2022). Communication conduct in an island community. mediastudies. Press.
Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020). Quality of feedback in higher education: A review of literature. Education Sciences, 10(3), 60.
Holzinger, A., Saranti, A., Angerschmid, A., Finzel, B., Schmid, U., & Mueller, H. (2023). Toward human-level concept learning: Pattern benchmarking for AI algorithms. Patterns.
Li, R., & Zhang, L. (2020). Research on the Promotion of Students’ Autonomous English Reading Ability through Reflective E-journal. 2020 6th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2020),
Ligado, F., Guray, N. D., & Bautista, R. G. (2022). Pedagogical beliefs, techniques, and practices towards hands-on science. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(10), 584-591.
Martin, R. (2023). A possibility-theoretic solution to Basu’s Bayesian–frequentist via media. Sankhya A, 1-28.
Matsuno, K. (2020). Accommodating probability to durability as facing the onset of biological phenomena from within. Philosophies, 5(4), 47.
Minggi, I., & Arwadi, F. (2021). The mathematical proof steps of mathematics study program students in the subject of real analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022). A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational research review, 35, 100416.
Prasad, G. (2021). Evaluating student performance based on bloom’s taxonomy levels. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Prasad, V., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2022). Constructive and obsessive criticism in science. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 52(11), e13839.
Praveena, M. A., Christy, A., Helen, L. S., Krishna, R. S., & Nandini, D. U. (2021). Examining and Predicting Helpfulness of reviews based on Naive Bayes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Raditya, A., Iskandar, R. S. F., & Suwarno, S. (2020). Questions analysis in mathematics textbook from competency-based curriculum up to curriculum 2013. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(2), 89-98.
Rahman, S. H. A., & Kamaruding, M. (2023). A Case of Project Risk Management Course: Students’ Feedback on Teaching and Learning.
Reinhart, A., Evans, C., Luby, A., Orellana, J., Meyer, M., Wieczorek, J., Elliott, P., Burckhardt, P., & Nugent, R. (2022). Think-aloud interviews: A tool for exploring student statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 30(2), 100-113.
Richardson, J. T. (2022). “Everybody Knows”: Reading from Screens. In The Legibility of Serif and Sans Serif Typefaces: Reading from Paper and Reading from Screens (pp. 83-90). Springer.
Schölkopf, B., Locatello, F., Bauer, S., Ke, N. R., Kalchbrenner, N., Goyal, A., & Bengio, Y. (2021). Toward causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5), 612-634.
Trimmer, J. T., & Guest, J. S. (2020). GIVE: A Framework of Assumptions for Constructive Review Feedback. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(19), 11648-11650.
Tunde, J., & Listiani, T. (2021). The implementation of direct instruction assisted by incomplete handout to increase conceptual understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
Verma, S. K. (2022). Role of Management Information Systems in Education Sector. Amity Journal of Professional Practices, 2(01).
Wati, L., & Afifah, S. (2023). The Effect of Learning Interest and Learning Environment on Student Learning Outcomes in History Class X IPS. Indonesian Journal of Education Research (IJoER), 4(2), 32-36.
Weiss, C. J. (2020). A creative commons textbook for teaching scientific computing to chemistry students with Python and Jupyter notebooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 489-494.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hendita Rifki Alfiansyah, Wulan Aulia Azizah , Wahyu Purwaningsih , Irma Wanty (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
